Capturing Daily Life




Recall News The 1982 Newsletters Education Corporate MegaCrimes Political Reform Point/ Counterpoint

Candidate Insider Photos

A Weblog by Heros Hero Photo David Scully Villains


Armstrong And Getty

Rule Sacramento Air !

October 26, 2004 (Tuesday)

Good Morning dear faithful readers, and blessed newcomers ! It is exactly one week before election day. My last entry was about a month ago. I've been at Perez (now Delta) Trucking this October, hauling tomatoes from Walnut Grove (Sacramento) down Interstate 5 to Buttonwillow (Bakersfield). I may stay here all year, even while I may work elsewhere. The operations manager and son-in-law here, Val, allowed me to bring my 48' dry van up here from Pixley, after he saw the photos of my ocean container and boat that were all shot up. They're good people here at Perez and, their farm by the river and the towns of Walnut Grove/Locke provide a quaint and relaxing rural environment that's not too backward. The farmers and Mexicans and Asians are cool, and then there's the city yuppies and wannabe-hip tourists. The most annoying ones are the alcoholic white guys living on boats on the river. You know someone's got a lifetime drinking problem when their speech is slurred even when they're sober. Well, it was the middle of the night when I rescued my 48' dry van from behind Gorzeman's violent dairy, and I accidentally damaged the fence of a rancher, Marion Howard. When I called Marion, an established lifetime resident of Pixley, who's been ranching that 1/4 section almost since I was born and L O N G before the dairy bully Gorzeman was born, Marion told me that there's kids out there with rifles who've shot up a lot of his stuff, too. Well, we're talking pretty much the middle of nowhere out there, and the only kids I ever saw (and they were carrying rifles on the four-wheelers they rode) were Gorzeman's kid with a Mexican kid in tow (probably the son of one of his dad's workers). So, it's pretty clear we have a person of interest, or, shall we say, a prime suspect, in the dairy bully Gorzeman's son.

The Presidential Election

Well...What to say ? As you can see from the above, I'm busy surviving. But, with all the misinformation and demagoguery out there, for those of you seeking my advice in this storm of information, I'll give it here. I think they're both good men, and I think both their wives are good women. I respect Kerry for his leadership in protesting the Viet Nam war. More than anyone, the combat veteran has earned the right to protest a war and to be regarded seriously. I think the Republicans won the conventions and, in style points, Kerry won the first debate. But I'm not much of a debater, myself. That's why I write rather than call talk radio show. I'm not an arguer. I'm a truth seeker, a problem solver, a solution finder. Debating is a skill that is mostly style. Excellent debaters are deceptive and confusing. They skillfully evade their own fallacies and contradictions and exploit even minor and trivial faults of the opponent with exaggeration. No, the careful, deliberate, solid mind is not the debater's mind. The responsible and reasonable thought processes of the mature mind may even seem plodding and dim-witted to the quick retorts and misleading accusations of the witty debater. I do not approve of the military tactics in Iraq for the past year and a half. We're letting our sons and daughters get picked off, especially in those small convoys. I think most patriotic and compassionate Americans were ecstatic that we "only" lost 300 or so during the successful invasion. We were willing to pay that price, and would have been glad if the numbers were in the low thousands, compared to some of the worst-case scenarios of losses of tens of thousands. But we are not willing to suffer ANY losses that can be avoided. George Bush is not proving that Americans are courageous by putting our boys in harm's way. The doctrine of overwhelming force worked quite well. He should return to it and stick to it and make the lives of our servicemen THE top priority. Having said that about our tactics, I ask you this: WHAT PART OF PRE-EMPTIVE WAR AGAINST TERRORISM DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND ? Sure, George choked a little in the stylistic game of debate, but listen to him in his campaign speeches, when he's in his element. Here's one Texan who's got the common sense that God gave every New Englander: WAITING FOR TERRORISTS TO STRIKE US WITH WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IS NOT AN OPTION ! After the invasion of Baghdad we got conciliatory gestures from Syria, Iran, and North Korea. Go ahead, search the newspapers of that time; I'm certain my memory serves me well. Libya's Kadafi even renounced use of WMD and permitted inspectors. WHY ? Because it's the real fuckin' world out there, not a god-damned American tv news program or university. Those people aren't playing by our sissy-ass rules and, for a moment, they thought we weren't either. Of course, George calculated that neutralizing Syria, Iran, and North Korea was not politically acceptable, but perhaps we're just postponing the inevitable and, in doing so, giving them the chance to beat us. We're going to have to do some MAJOR paradigm shifting to see the world as it is today, and stop fighting the ghosts of the fifties and the sixties. The reason we're fighting the battles of the fifties and sixties (Viet Nam protest, civil rights, feminism) is because the media-education complex boomers came of age way back then. They ARE The Establishment now. We're seeing the Enemy and it is THEM, the Liberal Establishment.

Armstrong And Getty

Well, now that I'm back in Sacramento and have had a few days off to sleep in and listen to the radio, I've been catching a bit of Armstrong and Getty on KSTE am 650. Armstrong has that unique and rare gift of a lightning wit combined with a sound, insightful mind. Getty matches him in those qualities, but his quieter personality makes him appear more of the "straight man" in their entertaining and stimulating presentation and vetting of current topics. And they also have excellent, knowledgeable experts on the phone to flush out the truth. This is NOT your typical "Two idiots talking to each other in the morning" show. These guys RULE the Sacramento Air and should be syndicated and put on XM and Sirius. They're also on channel 58 in the morning and are a lot better for the intelligent mind than those vapid network morning shows. They are especially refreshing in Sacramento's media Klique. It's really quite nauseating, the local Sacramento tv news networks - the same Klique, year after year, decade after decade after decade - and are they ever pleased with themselves! They should be voted in and out of their jobs, and have term limits, too. Unlike Armstrong and Getty, the Sacramento media Klique has perfected the talent of talking and talking and talking with apparent style, without ever saying anything. I remember one day I sat down in front of a local news program to catch up on the world's events, and they spent fully 20 minutes of a 30 minute broadcast talking about a baseball strike THAT DIDN'T EVEN HAPPEN ! "The fans are the real winners", they concluded. Jesus, talk about airheads ! What did Armstrong and Getty talk about today ? Something nobody else is talking about, at least not the way A & G are. They're talking about THE OCTOBER SURPRISE. The October Surprise is that 350 tons (or 350 thousand tons, maybe) of potent explosives are suddenly, inexplicably missing from an Iraqi weapons site that OUR INCREDIBLY INCOMPETENT ARMY, UNDER GEORGE BUSH, COMPLETELY FORGOT TO SECURE. Problem with the story is, the NBC embedded newsguy said the munitions were missing a year and a half ago when the U.S. army arrived there. Armstrong and Getty did a good analysis of this, this morning, actually giving a count of how many and which tv news outlets aired the story. And only one, once, mentioned what the embedded reporter said. The source of this fake story is the International Atomic Energy Commission who were apparently overseeing the munitions before the liberation of Iraq from Saddam. A & G opined how frightful and insidious it is that an international organization such as the AEC is trying to influence the election for Kerry who, of course, favors empowering international commissions.

CONCLUSION

We have a choice between two good men, but not great men. Bush represents proactive national security, and is endorsed by the likes of Sen. John McCain and Rudolph Giuliani. Kerry, too, is a good man, and I feel affection for his Irish-Catholic background, but he's supported by the likes of Bill Clinton, and he represents the old-fashioned liberalism of the sixties. The fake NBC new story that Rather had to apologize for, and this current OCTOBER SURPRISE make the choice clear. As I've said before, even though conservatives suck, liberals S U C K ! WE NEED NEW PARADIGMS, new and courageous thinking to face the coming decades and century/centuries. I say, re-elect Bush and then, after the election, vigorously speak your mind to protect the lives of our soldiers, and to combat the continued, chronic, evil corporate theft.

When It's Over, It's Over

I pledge to support the winner of the electoral vote. Those are the rules we play by. And I call upon all of us to support the winner of the electoral vote. Then, I call upon all of us to demand honest and relevant news reporting and campaigning.

Paranoid Or Alert ?

The name of the administrator encouraging me to apply to teach in Karachi, Pakistan is PELOSI.

Publications In My Mailbox

The monthly (on the average) trip to my mailbox is often quite an adventure. I get various publications, most of which I didn't request. One which I welcome is the occasional update from St. Peter's Prep. People grow and change, and so do institutions. and I have great respect for Catholic educational institutions. On the other hand are the unsolicited newsletters from UCD, UOP, and CSUS. but, like The International Educator, you gotta browse 'em to know what the assholes are up to. Got one from the UCD history dept, a while back, shortly after I mentioned them in this blog. Apparently, from the newsletter, 90% of their faculty is from the middle east.

New Paradigm

See, that's an example of what I call a need for a new paradigm. The reason, I was told, that we welcomed foreign students into our universities to study is that it would increase understanding and, hence, peace. OK, nice theory. But we've had a very, very large and growing population of middle eastern students in our universities for decades. And they hate us and try to destroy us. Can you muster up a little common sense and intellectual honesty and courage to admit that the idea is flawed, and that they should be expelled from the country ?

Halabi Ready To Serve ?

Halabi dodged a bullet. Now, reports come out of more and more of those detainees at Guantanamo, Cuba, who've returned to Afghanistan to fight again. How does he see things now ? Has he had time to re-assess his experience ? Is he appalled that those prisoners who seduced his sympathy are now fighting us again ? Or does he just want to get out ? Did he find the experience too traumatic ? Does he sympathize with the rebels ? Or does he have a deeper understanding of the difficulty of war and an appreciation for the country and system that treated him fairly, even leniently ? If he is determined to be loyal to the U.S., his experience could be invaluable OJT in emotional and psychological warfare, and his experience could be as valuable as that of a combat veteran. If he can be trusted.

The Sacramento Union

, since 1851, is coming out again. They sent me a preview edition, and they'll be coming out as SacUnion.com in January, and perhaps in hard copy, too. OK fine, I'll give 'em a fair reading. The Sacramento Union wasn't good to me in 1982 when I went to them with my newsletters that I had just written as founder of "The Men's Liberation Organization" at Sac State. In fact, the newsguy just chuckled that I had copyrighted each issue by posting a copyright notice on the front page of each issue. But that was just one person, one time, one place. I can and will rise above it. You know, if you study the history of the development of the computer industry in silicon valley, you'll find that all the pioneers got together and worked and shared like on a mission, or adventure, and all benefitted. But, to the extent that conservatives are clique-ish and greedy, read my lips, "Kiss My Ass". I will bring you down. To the extent that they are fair and team-spirited and collegial, I say, "You can count on me".

The Irish

I think Tom Sullivan of Sacramento radio and tv news is a credit to the Irish for his successful career. I lampooned Tom pretty hard to make a point and show people how things work and make sure they know who I am. Tom's a big boy and he can take it. Shelley is an Irishman of a temperament the opposite of Sullivan's. Shelley is young bully, a partisan Democrat in an position that is anathema to partisanship.

I'll Be Back.

Posted by dscully at 77:77 vt Top of Page

David Scully




Bio Weblog Archives

email davidscully @hotmail.com

Weblog Archives Home