TEMPLATE
(Note. I agree with RFK, but this post is about Schultz's words which support my 1982 action.
That is, I objected strenuously to a rude instructor's comment, rudely spoken, that 
"calling a white woman a 'womens libber' is JUST AS BAD AS calling a black man the nword.")
That is, comparing the protected and cared-for wife/daughter/beloved status to the horrible reality of being a chattel slave,
an ABSURD AND DEEPLY HURTFUL AND HARMFUL COMPARISON.

thank you, Debbie, for ... THE CONFIRMATION

"ABSURD AND DEEPLY HURTFUL AND HARMFUL COMPARISON"

I agree. COMPARISONS can be DEEPLY HURTFUL AND HARMFUL ... and sometimes ABSURD too. In 1982, I did not use this phrase to describe a COMPARISON that I was appalled by. That is, I did not call the COMPARISON that I heard, "ABSURD AND DEEPLY HURTFUL AND HARMFUL." It was, though. It certainly was. It certainly was ABSURD AND DEEPLY HURTFUL AND HARMFUL. My mind boggled at how to explain the obvious. But if I had used that phrase back then, I don't think it would have made much, or any, difference. The main reason that I am grateful that I have heard Ms. Schultz describe a COMPARISON as ABSURD AND DEEPLY HURTFUL AND HARMFUL is because it CONFIRMS what I was trying to express in 1982. OK ... big deal, right? I mean, isn't that soooo yesterday? And so what if I didn't excel in writing for that particular issue? Get over it, dude! Except ... it really did become a very, very big deal in my life ... and ... it speaks volumes about the horribleness of our society.
SCROLL DOWN

"CALLING A WHITE WOMAN A 'WOMENS LIBBER' IS JUST AS BAD AS CALLING A BLACK MAN A %@gg@%"

That is indeed an Absurd And Deeply Harmful And Hurtful Comparison. THAT was pretty much The Spark That Lit The Revolution.
Keeping this short, Today (Saturday November 16, 2024) I've written thousands of words under this, but I'm going to clip them, and place them on subsequent pages. BRIEFLY. The instructor in my COBOL computer class rudely and mockingly scolded me with that absurd statement at a weekly social with her old hippie husband, the department chair watching and smirking from a nearby table. It was the final straw. I flipped him off as I left with a verbal FU and established a student organization to discuss liberal fascism on campus and the degrading university culture, which was also pervading the nation. In my first polite and collegial issue, I quoted what she said and explained how she mockingly jabbed her finger to my nose edge as she said it. "CALLING A WHITE WOMAN A "WOMENS' LIBBER" IS JUST AS BAD AS CALLING A BLACK MAN A %@gg@% !" I did not redact the nword as I have in the line above. When I quoted her, I put the whole bad-boy word in there. I tried my best to critique what she said, but I found it hard to explain the obvious. How does one illuminate a Sunburst? Life of privileged, protected, loved and cared for wives and daughters ... NOT EQUAL TO ... Life of chattel (property) slave. (Basically, I believe the white females HIJACKED the Civil Rights Movement, STEALING IT from the African Americans, and the glory and compensation. I believe that was also the opinion of Michael Steele, fmr RNC chair_ Finally, I decided that the people best suited to express outrage were the people most offended, African Americans. So, I wrote a few sentences about how absurd and ridiculous and wrong her statement was, and then I said, "But you know what I'd really like to know ... I'd like to know what the nwords think about it." Again, I printed the whole 6-letter nword.
SCROLL DOWN Well, that's all the excuse the liberals needed (and that was basically 90% of the faculty at sac state). In an Orwellian response, with doses of chutzpah that would have made New York City proud, they decided that I was the racist. SHE is the one who said the nword. (in an aggressive and rude and hostile way). I never said it, nor did I say "womens' libber") I merely encouraged the African American community at the university to tell her how offensive and wrong it was what she said. (Also, I felt that African Americans might get offended if I tried to fight for them ... because it was their place to respond to it). So basically, they pretended sympathy for her ("why do I pick on little old ladies?" - Actually, I eventually tore up scores of white boy faculty)
This lie (that I'm the racist, not them) has extended for 42 1/2 years, and just ten years ago in 2014, 32 1/2 years after the 1982 Revolution, I was illegally denied employment by civil servants at the State of Pennsylvania - employment in a position the law required them to offer me. That is, based on the PA Civil Service Law called "The Rule Of 3" for Veterans and my rank on the list, they were required to offer the position to me first. We had a telephone interview (because I worked driving a truck rather than sit and wait for a call that could take months or years) and it was not recorded and there were 3 interviewers and they all agreed on the same outright LIE. They said that I said that I would not rent to the negroes. ABSURD! THAT WAS AN ABSURD LIE! THEY COMPLETELY LIED ABOUT THAT. AND THEY'LL LIE ABOUT ANYTHING. THEY DO IT TO KEEP ME POOR. THAT WAS A $60K/YR JOB 10 YEARS AGO - MORE THAN A HALF MILLION BY NOW. AND IT SHOWS HOW THEY CARRY ON, AND BUILD ON A LIE THAT WAS 32 1/2 YEARS OLD 10 YEARS AGO! 42 1/2 YEAR OLD STRAW MAN MYTHS. "Keep it cheap!" - meaning "poor" - is their mantra about me. But this has been going on for over 4 decades, and I'm hoping that the smart people in The Republican Party - not the old Stupid Party Republcans - but the Musks, the Vances, the Gabbards, the Tuckers, and especially also those who've been involved in campus criticisms, like the Thiels, the Stephen Millers, the Charlie Kirks - can help me right 42 1/2 years of insolent wrongs.

FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!


SCROLL DOWN THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14
Gilbert Doctorow
informs us what the Kremlin thinks
of the selection by Senate Republicans
of he non-Trumpite John Thune
to be their leader.


(at 6 minutes, 25 seconds)
Houthis hit the USS Abraham Lincoln
aircraft carrier with hypersonic
ballistic missiles, and it returns to US.
US press not covering the story.




To Top See Video



The question of the US possibly attacking Iran was posed by Judge Napolitano given
bellicose statements of the newly named candidate members
of Donald Trump's administration, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.

However, as I explain in this interview, I do not give any credence to such concerns.
Yes, most members of the 'power ministries' Trump has named are tough guys.
But talking tough is most likely just a necessary Act One to precede an Act Two
when we see a possible outreach to Iran by the President himself similar to what he did
with Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Back then his move was sabotaged by Bolton
and other assistants who were determined to undermine his foreign policy initiatives.
This time his team will consist only of loyalists who will bite their tongues
on relations with Iran and do his bidding.

When I say this I have in mind how the United States normalized relations with
the People's Republic of China in the 1970s. It was precisely the leading anti-Communist
among American politicians, Richard Nixon, who was able to pull off the enormous
concession of agreeing to a One China policy. Similarly, it was that same arch
anti-Communist who entered into detente with the Soviets. Donald Trump may not have
a great interest in history overall but I think he is well aware
of the foregoing preconditions for slashing the Gordian knots  
(Gordian knot definition. a problem solvable only by bold action)
that the Democrats have created with Russia and in West Asia.

Let us assume that I am wrong and Trump goes against his own first principle of
not starting new wars and joins Israel on an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities and
oil and gas production infrastructure.  What will the Russians do?  At the very least,
they will provide Iran with whatever it needs to reduce the damage of such an attack
by supplying still more S-400 air defenses as well as advanced fighter jets to keep US
and Israeli planes at a distance from the Iranian frontiers.  They will provide
satellite and AWACS intelligence to thwart the intentions of the US and Israeli forces.

SCROLL DOWN
However, I think that the Russians would devote more attention to providing technical
assistance and offensive materiel to all of the axis of resistance countries
as they strike US assets in the region. Surely the Russians were a factor in the
successful Houthi missile and drone attack yesterday on the US aircraft carrier
Abraham Lincoln and its task force, which are now said to be withdrawing from the Red Sea
and Persian Gulf to San Diego, presumably for repairs. In this way, the Russians can
frustrate US intentions in the region without entering into a direct military clash
with American forces that would be escalatory.

But saying this is to omit the Chinese factor which will certainly come into play
if there is a risk of US-Israeli attack on the oil and gas facilities of Iran.
China is greatly dependent on oil from Iran and from other Persian Gulf suppliers
to maintain its industry. If risk of US attack were coming, the Chinese have the means
to deliver great setbacks to the US position in the Pacific, beginning with
a rapid takeover of Taiwan by means of naval and air blockade
such as they were rehearsing a month ago.   To Top See Videos

Gilbert Doctorow
informs us what the Kremlin thinks
of Trump's nomination of Tulsi Gabbard
to head US Intelligence,
and of Matt Gaetz as Attorney General


(at 14 minutes, 44 seconds)
Appointment of Tulsi
to reign in the 3-letter agencies
a remarkable appointment that
raises confidence in Trump







SCROLL DOWN


Transition Trump/Vance Is Happening


Did The Kremlin Prefer Harris? Yes.
DOCTOROW explains why.

Are Russians rejoicing Trump because
he'll end the war by defunding it?

Will Putin Send Lavrov to negotiate? Yes.
SCROLL DOWN

Where do you see things going
for the next 6 to 8 months?

Best Choice For Ambassador To Russia is Gilbert Doctorow

October

Intro To BRICs
Brazil, Russia, India, China
South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, UAE

Doctorow Praises Trump
"Donald Trump today
has at his side formidable
thinkers and actors"

"Russian Diplomacy
Is Probably The Best
In The World."

China Is The Economic leader and
Russia Is The Diplomatic Leader.
SCROLL DOWN

Doctorow reports on BRICS 2024
from the Russian Perspective
Russians are Overjoyed by its success
(much as we Trump supporters are
overjoyed with TRUMP/VANCE success)
Gilbert Doctorow is a professional Russia watcher and actor in Russian affairs going back to 1965.
He is a magna cum laude graduate of Harvard College (1967), a past Fulbright scholar,
and holder of a Ph.D. with honors in history from Columbia University (1975).

Completing his studies, Mr. Doctorow pursued a business career focused on the USSR and Eastern Europe.
For twenty-five years he worked for US and European multinationals in marketing and general management
with regional responsibility.

From 1998-2002, Doctorow served as the Chairman of the Russian Booker Literary Prize in Moscow.
In the 2010-2011 academic year, he was a Visiting scholar of the Harriman Institute, Columbia University.

Since 2008, Mr. Doctorow has been regularly publishing analytical articles
about international affairs on the portal of the Belgian daily La Libre Belgique.
From this material he produced four collections of essays,
the most recent of which appeared in October 2017: "Does the United States Have a Future?"

Mr. Doctorow's next project will be a memoir of his corporate service in Moscow in the wild 1990s.

Mr. Doctorow is an American citizen and a long-time resident of Brussels, Belgium.

BRICS not all about
de-dollarization, says Doctorow

SCROLL DOWN

GILBERT DOCTOROW re-established The American Committee For East-West Accord in 2015 Doctorow did it with U.S. Ambassador to the Soviet Union, JACK F. MATLOCK JR. (1987 to 1991 under Ronald Reagan).

(note. I met Ambassador Matlock at the 2012 Forum in DC, and some Russians were posing the two of us together in the hallway for photos. I felt it was an encouraging, positive gesture and I suppose the Russians would have chosen me as the next U.S. Ambassador to Russia, but I believe Ambassador Matlock was underwhelmed by my quietness as we walked together to Washington Union Station that afternoon. I was not a Russian expert, just a friendly citizen-diplomat. President Trump wants good relations with Russia, and Vice President Elect JD Vance emphasizes DIPLOMACY. SCROLL DOWN

Veterans Day, 11/11/2024


Dedicated To Ray McGovern

You Already Won Me Over

Just To Be With You
Is Having The Best Days Of My Life

There's no need to feel down
at the YMCA!
 
To the Magnificent JD Vance of The United States,

  Desiring to present myself to your Magnificence with some testimony of my devotion towards you,
I have not found among my possessions anything which I hold more dear than, or value so much as,
my knowledge of the actions of great men.
  One such great man of this time is one RAY MCGOVERN (seen below), 

What Are The 5 Eyes?

Scroll Down



Did Israel damage Iran or
were their stealth bombers locked onto
and they turned back?
SCROLL DOWN

Trump and Putin have not talked
since February 20, 2023, says Peskov,
spokesperson for Putin.
It was Washington Post fake news.

Alastair Crooke
Alastair Crooke, 30 years MI6
EU Special Envoy to Middle East
Alastair Crooke

Ambassador Chas Freeman

Col Douglas MacGregor

NEXT PAGE