*************************************************
subbing
****************************************************************************'87 to
So, Our Graduate Student Subbed
From '87 to '90 ?
That's right.
That activist vp where Our Graduate Student
did his student teaching,
the one who was always hangin' in the hallways
with that old white female teacher of "the oldest childrenation,"
spitefully remarked one day during that last week,
"so, gettin' any interviews ?"
So, even then, before he got his credential,
they were blocking Our Graduate Student
from even getting interviews.
Of course, since there was always a "critical shortage"
of math and science teachers
Our Graduate Student should have been sought after
by schools everywhere.
They should have been knocking on his door.
Our Graduate Student had made it clear
during that "ice cream celebration,"
and the decision was firmly made in his own mind,
that he would not accept a job at that high school
where he endured so much hostility and obstructionism
and attempts to actually derail his student teaching.
Even the principal acknowledged the harassment.
Really ?
Yes. One day, well into the semester,
they had an assembly of all the teachers in the school
and the principal was addressing them.
Her acknowlegement of the harassment was oblique.
I don't know why people can't just say things
straight out, like Our Graduate Student does.
She looked at Our Graduate Student and said,
"It surprising how things can be going on in the school
without even the principal knowing about it."
Someone had turned off a fan
that was right behind Our Graduate Student,
and the principal said,
"Please turn that fan back on"
So That Was An Acknowledgement of A Conspiracy
Of Harassment Of Our Graduate Student ?
I told you it was oblique.
It's fuzzy leadership.
That's the feel-good way things are done today.
Hint. Just hint.
It's a feminine, feel-good, be nice and just hint kind of leadership.
We don't have Teddy Roosevelts and Harry Trumans any more.
How Would Our Graduate Student Have Handled It
If He Were Principal ?
Our Graduate Student would have said,
"NOW YOU ALL LISTEN TO ME,
AND YOU LISTEN TO ME REAL GOOD.
I FOUND OUT ABOUT THIS CONSPIRACY TO HARASS AND OBSTRUCT
OUR GRADUATE STUDENT.
IT'S GONNA END RIGHT NOW.
PERIOD.
NO QUESTIONS.
NO REMARKS.
NO DISCUSSION.
IF IT DOESN'T END, HEADS ARE GONNA ROLL.
MR. SCULLY, I APOLOGIZE FOR THEIR UNPROFESSIONAL,
UNCOLLEGIAL BEHAVIOR.
MY DOOR IS OPEN, AND YOU ARE WELCOME AND ENCOURAGED
TO VISIT ME EVERY DAY.
I WILL DEFINITELY VISIT YOUR CLASSROOM EVERY DAY
FOR THE REST OF THE SEMESTER
TO MAKE SURE THERE ARE NO FURTHER SUCH PROBLEMS."
But, Instead, She Just Hinted About A Fan
Which Was Right Behind Mr. Scully,
And Hence Represented Mr. Scully,
and Requested (Didn't Order It)
That It Be Turned Back On.
That's right.
It's the feminization of America.
hint. hint. hint.
It makes you appear so clever.
It's like a puzzle, a code language,
all this symbolic talk.
It makes the audience feel so clever, too,
and so admiring of the speaker.
They both feel so clever.
It's like a little code language
and only they understand it.
It's a club, an exclusionary club.
It's a fact of life, recognized by comedians.
The skit goes like this.
"You make a female president,
and everything'll change, especially foreign policy.
Yeah, she'll bomb some country
and their president'll say,
"What the heck did you do THAT for ?",
and she'll reply,
"Oh, I think you know why, mister.
I think you know why !"
Well, if the comedians say it,
then it's true.
That's right.
You know something's true when the comedians get onto it.
They're the baromenters, the weathermen.
Now masculine leadership would go something like this,
"Now listen, GODDAMMIT !
I found out you people are fucking with Mr. Scully,
and if it doesn't end RIGHT NOW
I'm gonna screw every one of you motherfuckers
SO BAD you'll wish you were never born."
But, there's no Teddy Roosevelts or Harry Trumans any more,
except in the middle east.
american males are just bitches, afraid of legal consequences,
so they never say ANYTHING.
They just hint stuff, like the females.
They follow the females lead.
The females are the leaders.
So, anyway, Our Graduate Student
takes one more "Teaching Reading" class that summer
at that traffic and certification stamping school,
gets his credentials and starts subbing everywhere.
He figures he'll get known
and he'll be hired by a school that wants him there,
not a school that wants to "put him in his place," at best.
What That A Good Class ?
That One About Teaching Reading ?
Oh, it was sheer nonsense,
an agonizing gruel.
You had to put in your hours and regurgitate gobbledygook.
Our Graduate Student was practically having a nervous breakdown
after that grueling war he had been through
doing his student teaching
He had to drive all the way down to stockton every day.
Wear and tear on him, his car, gas expense,
a total waste of time and energy.
Some old baby boomer female waddling around,
thinking the world of herself because she had a doctorate.
It was ridiculous.
She was from Jersey or something
and she intentionally insulted Our Graduate Student
by referring to "that Irish ghetto in South Orange."
One day there was a discussion going on
about selecting reading texts of graduated difficulty
and someone in the class complains that
when a student had learned to read a more difficult text
that you wouldn't be able to use that text any more
"because the student's reading skills had improved."
Our Student contributes that
"that's the whole purpose of teaching reading."
The waddling baby boomer pauses and beams at him approvingly,
She dramatically puts her index finger on her tongue and wets it.
Then she emphatically scores him an imaginary point
on the imaginary scoreboard in the air in front of her."
For this he had to pay tuition ?
Oy Vey.
So, The Purpose Of Teaching Reading
Is To Make Students Better Readers ?
What A Concept !
You know, I think I'm startin' to like you.
Aw Shucks. Thanks.
But It's Not Hard
To Not Be THAT Stupid.
Yeah.
Teacher Ed courses are a total waste of time.
I predict the trend is
that classroom teaching will become obsolete,
except for science and technical classes,
where teachers are needed
so you don't waste time getting stuck
on "difficult" problems
that they can make easy.
Good educational videos and documentaries,
and good text and supplementary reading
are all that's needed today
for excellent education for everyone.
For the younger kids,
you don't need
(da, da da da, da dah !)
(drum roll, please !)
"professional" TEACHERS !
Older kids would do the job better,
and would cost much less.
You see, this whole "TEACHING" mystique
is just a Mythology.
We're all natural learners and natural teachers.
Today's teachers are just a special interest group
of shallow (but often clever) liberals
who are really well paid
and get lots of time off
and WAY more respect than they deserve,
considering the horrible results of their work.
Bigger kids who are good role models
would do a better job of herding around
and minding the little ones.
They'd have more interest and energy, too.
What About The Bigger Kids ?
They'd have young adults supervising them.
It's a lifelong process,
passing along the accumulated wisdom and knowledge
of the culture, generation by generation.
(PUT HERE THE QUOTE BY DURAND VIA SOWELL)
Often those who have just learned something
are better able to teach it to others
because the learning of it is fresh in their minds.
The experience of learning that thing is fresh in their minds.
If there was anything about it that was confusing
when they were trying to learn it,
they'll remember that.
They'll say to their younger friends and students,
"Now this part confused me at first when I was learning it,
but it's not that hard. Let me explain it."
And there can be older people supervising the big kids.
You can have juniors and seniors teaching freshmen,
college kids and graduate students
and young adults teaching high schoolers,
and the older kids can have older people supervising them. and so on.
People have mentors and advisors through their careers
in one way or another, if they are to succeed.
We need to stop thinking of "teachers" as being just one thing.
We need to stop lumping K-12 education and teaching into one word.
Teaching and minding kindergartners is a whole different world
from teaching seniors in high school.
Each step along the way -
primary, intermediate, jr. high, high, college -
is a totally different world.
It's ridiculous to put somebody with that paper called a college diploma
into a class in front of a waddling, edubabbling ex-radical matron
and then annoint them as a
dum da da da da dah !
"TEACHER !" of all ages and grades !
Kindergartners could be minded and taught by
eighth grade girls with fifth grade girls assisting them.
Jr. high boys could be well managed and taught
by role model high school boys and college students,
supervised by men.
That's An Interesting Idea.
I Like It, But I Feel Uncomfortable With It.
Well, that's quite common.
It's "out of the box" thinking,
"out of the envelope" thinking
from someone who is not vested in the system
and therefore doesn't have the internal censorship
on his own thinking that the people at the education trough do.
The discomfort that you're feeling with these ideas
is often refereed to as Cognitive Dissonance.
Oh Yes ! Cognitive Dissonance !
Yes, it's common for people to react with unease
to ideas that are outside of their comfort zones.
It's happened throughout history.
People often react like ideas are crazy
even though those ideas are true and correct.
Sometimes it takes a long time, even centuries,
for these correct ideas to be accepted,
just because they're outside people's comfort zones.
Take, for example, the heliocentric (sun-centered)
view of the solar system,
or the idea of evolution,
or the idea that liberal fascist censorship and
McCarthyism of the left are bad.
These correct ideas have all met with resistance,
scorn, ridicule, and contempt.
The ideas of Our Graduate Student,
which he presented in His 1982 Newsletters,
were treated with scorn, ridicule, contempt, and resistance
until rush limbaugh made those ideas mainstream,
and D'Souza and Ravitch gave those ideas
the imprimatur of their scholarly works.
But these things take time, sometimes.
Even though Our Graduate Student's ideas
have been lifted from scorn and ridicule
to their rightfully respected and honored elevation,
Our Graduate Student himself
has never been freed from the chains and the bonds
and the indignities and humiliations of scorn and contempt and ridicule.
His reputation and image have been beheaded and stoned.
There has been a conspiracy for decades
by left coast politicians at the highest levels
to label him as a fraud.
They even falsely accused him of murdering a young woman in Alaska !
A "false positive" on dna, whatever the hell that means !
Murder !?
That's About As Far As You Can Go
In Trying To Destroy A Man's Character And Reputation !
How The Hell Can You Have A "False Positive" On A DNA Match !?"
Isn't That Shit Like A Billion Or A Trillion To One In Reliablility !?
That's Right !
It's Despicable, Don't You Agree ?
Yes, Of Course I Do !
Tell Me About It !
Give Me The Details !
Well, we're jumpin' ahead now.
But, very quickly...
Well, Our Graduate Student had returned to sacramento
from Alaska and he's drivin' a truck over the road.
He comes home one day and his ex tell him
the police came over to talk about
the murder of some girl in Alaska.
Our Graduate Student's annoyed
and he's thinkin', "the harassment never stops, does it !?"
So he just ignores it.
He'd left Alaska because the factions up there
are just an extension of the factions in sacramento
and they had harassed him up there
and kept him marginalized and impoverished
just as they had in sacramento.
So, he just ignored them,
told off some cop from alaska
who was tellin' his ex, on the phone,
that he was havin' affairs with girls in alaska.
That wasn't true,
but any relationships Our Graduate Student has
wasn't that cop's business or any cop's business.
and he was contemptible for saying those things
to Our Graduate Student's ex on the phone,
like a pervert making obscene phone calls.
So, Our Graduate Student talks to him one day on the phone
and tells him what a contemptable punk he is
and answers a few questions and orders him
to never bother him or his family again.
He told that alaska cop to leave him alone
and go bother the creepy, perverted anchorage city bus drivers.
The son of one of them had committed a well-publicized murder
in the 90's and the father was denying it.
Eventually, a couple of law enforcement officers
met him at a bankruptcy hearing
and asked him for a dna sample and he gave it.
He never gave it any thought after that.
He was concerned for a little while that he was being set up,
so he called a reporter at "The Anchorage Daily News,"
and asked him what the hell was going on,
and the reporter said the bereaved mother was raising hell.
That's understandable, in retrospect,
considering how many years the son of that sla victim
(the church lady who had been murdered my mary jane olson (soliah)
in the carmichael, ca, bank)
had to demand command the sacramento da, jan scully, to prosecute her.
So, What's With The False Positive ?
OK, so Our Graduate Student
doesn't give it any more thought.
He didn't do it and he figured
the dna would clear him.
He figured the cops were just doin' their job,
so he was big enough to let it all slide and forget about it.
The poor girl, the poor mother, the hard-working cops.
Just let it go. It wasn't important.
Then What ?
Well, that was all in about '96 and '97.
So, about 11 or 12 years later, in the Fall of 2008,
Our Graduate Student gets a phone call from Neil Katz of CBS News.
Neil Katz tells him that there was a "false positive" on his dna
and that he was suspected of the murder,
but that they finally caught the real murderer
in jail somewhere up in New England for another crime.
Well, That's All Very Disconcerting.
Disconcerting ?
Disconcerting ?
Dis con fucking certing !?
I think it's a little more than disconfuckingcerting !
For a dozen fucking years he's a murder suspect !
That might go to explain why a lot of people
had been whispering behind his back
and treating him stange and cautiously
and keeping him at arms-length all decade !
I'm sure the police in Davis, ca and Burbank, ca
and Palm Springs, ca and Middletown, pa
all places he frequented or lived,
were notified that he was a murder suspect,
and they must have notified local community members
to be cautious and wary of him
because he was a not yet convicted murderer !
You don't think that's gonna
affect your quality of life a little !?
I...I See Your Point There.
In all those places he got a strange vibe,
but you never know,
when they're out to get you,
WHICH life experiences are related to the plot,
and which are just life.
For example, in Davis, ca in the early 2000's,
around 2000 to 2002,
he's taking internet and microsoft classes
and he meets this exotic, fascinating girl
who works in the local cafe.
She's frrrrrom Rrrrroma
(half Swedish, half Italian)
and she has the foxy accent to prove it.
Well, it was probably doomed from the start
because Davis is full of Berkeley wannabes.
They wannabe Berkeley radicals
but they're livin' out there in farm country.
It was gettin' gentrified
and full of armchair leftist radicals or
"progressives," as they started calling themselves.
Our Graduate Student was part of that tsunami
that made "liberal" a dirty word.
Who knows? Maybe he STARTED that tsunami in 1982.
Our Graduate Student, remember,
wrote the script for the rush limbaugh program
right there in sacramento, about 5 or 10 miles away.
They knew him and they'd do everything they could
to sabotage his happiness and his relationship
with the foxy babe from Rrrrrroma.
So, one day, some middle aged female
who was part of the cafe roma orbit,
chats up Our Graduate Student at the bagel shop
and invites him to a movie and he goes along.
It's this movie
with Robin Williams playing this writer character
who moved up to Alaska
and murdered a girl there for rejecting him sexually.
Williams isn't worried about the Alaska cops,
who he figures will never discover his crime,
but he worries when this cop from LA comes up to investigate.
So, the movie goes on and on and,
at the end of the movie
the middle aged companion looks at Our Graduate Student
and says, "Well ?"
Our Graduate Student shrugs. It was an OK movie.
Not his preferred genre, but...OK.
Later on it plays in his mind
because he had sooooooo much in common
with that Robin Williams character.
I mean HE also was a teacher and a writer
who went to Alaska and stayed.
He had socialized a lot with women of all ages,
including middle aged women and younger women.
It almost seemed that the Robin Williams character
was based on him !
Except...
Except Our Graduate Student Didn't Murder Anyone.
Correctamundo.
But it was just so odd.
It really did feel like the movie was based on him,
and it felt like the Robin Williams character resembled him,
but he figured it couldn't be based on him
because "Why would Hollywood base a movie on him ?"
and, besides, he didn't kill anybody
so that story wasn't his story.
But still, he wondered.
Unbelievable similarity except that he didn't kill anybody
like the character in the movie did.
A year or so later, just after the 2003 Recall Election,
an arnold schwarzenegger movie came out
and he thought there was a character there
that was a satire of him.
Describe That Character.
He was a young man in a cage, in China, screaming and yelling.
The schwarzenegger character asked, "What's he doing in there ?"
and they replied, "urinating in public."
It was a comedy.
So, they let him out and he urinated again.
and they put him back in the cage and he started screaming again.
Did Our Graduate Student Urinate in Public ?
No, but he lived in a camper
and he often drove a truck and slept in the truck sleeper.
When you live like that, you urinate in a container.
If you're parked out somewhere where no one can see you
(in other words, NOT in public view)
then it's often easier to urinate while concealed from view
beside or behind the camper or big rig.
But, during the heat of the campaign in 2003,
Our Graduate Student did satirically suggest,
in writing to schwarzenegger's campaign,
urinating in a bottle on a statue of mulholland.
Mulholland, the head of the ca Democratic party,
had threatened schwarzenegger's life.
"wait 'til the bullets start flying," he said.
That was probably an allusion to the "kennedy curse",
schwarzenegger being married to a kennedy.
But these fucking liberals are so entitled
they get away with everything, even threats of murdering
the Republican gubernatorial candidate.
It's just a big fucking game.
They're the elite players and we're just the spectators.
The elite players have different rules, just to keep the game going,
and they can get away with just about anything.)
They can threaten to murder a Gubernatorial candidate
and get away with it.
The rest of us couldn't get away with that.
And schwarzenegger and his staff were punks
for letting Mulholland threaten him that way.
Our Graduate Student DID really kinda think
both of those characters were based on him,
but it didn't make sense to him.
He wasn't well known, he thought. He wasn't famous.
How could that Alaska teacher guy in the movie be based on him ?
How could that imprisoned urinating guy in china be based on him ?
Was There Anything That Tied Our Graduate Student To China ?
Yes, he often lived near Locke, ca
about 10 or 15 miles south of Davis and sacramento.
Locke is the oldest chinese community in the U.S.,
and he had other chinese ties just from life and work.
I mean, that girl he dated at sac city was chinese american,
and he had attended the chinese united methodist church,
and had worked for and with chinese americans.
So NOW What Does Our Graduate Student Think
About Those Movies ?
Well, he NOW understands
that he was a murder suspect
with a "false positive" dna,
whatever the hell that means.
THAT sounds REALLY suspicious to him
because dna is hit or miss, isn't it.
It's more accurate than a fingerprint, by far, isn't it ?
So, if he was suspected of murdering a college aged girl in Alaska,
would they have made a movie like that and lured him to watch it
to frighten him or otherwise get him to say something
that would incriminate him ?
Are You Asking Me Or Is That Rhetorical ?
Both. Either.
It is interesting to consider
that Our Graduate Student actually WAS imprisoned
by schwarzenegger about a year or two later.
Was that their goal ?
Were they planning to imprison him ?
Did they think (by some sort of deranged liberal fascist calculus.
hell hath no fury greater than women's libbers and feminazis
and liberal fascists scorned) that he deserved to be imprisoned
for the Alaska murder that they convicted him of in their minds
without a trial or because they just plain hated him
for being smart, strong, honest and good looking
and for being the neoconservative who started the limbaugh revolution ?
I mean, after a while, you don't know what was the cause for what.
I mean, was the "false dna positive" an attempt to frame him for murder ?
What about the attempt by U.S. Senator barbara boxer
to frame Our Graduate Student with bankruptcy fraud ?
That one is a FACT. Hands down. No question about it.
Our Graduate Student thinks
that the murder suspect thing may have been an attempt to frame him
but regardless, once it was out there and all the officials knew about it
(law enforcement agencies, governors and senators and their aides)
it reinforced the liberals' argument that he was a bad person
(who rocked the country by writing Newsletters, like MLK)
who had been getting away with it for a long time,
and deserved to be punished.
boxer went after him for a federal offense,
and schwarzenegger had him arrested as a felony fugitive, and imprisoned.
Those motherfuckers were out to GET
Our Graduate Student,
and still are probably.
That's why he fled
across the country.
Understanding EXACTLY where every piece of the puzzle fits,
and EXACTLY which pieces were part of the puzzle
and which pieces weren't
is not possible.
Some of the pieces are clearly part of the puzzle.
senator boxer tried to frame him.
yolo county education administrator elizabeth ruport
tried to entrap him.
schwarzenegger imprisoned him and tried to nail him on a felony.
Viewing further back, once the naivete and innocence has been shattered,
one considers sacramento anne rudin coming to the room where he was subbing,
and mockingly warning him.
You have to consider EVERYTHING in light of these clear pieces
of the puzzle.
It's ALL in Our Graduate Student's mind.
He lived it all.
Now he tries to remember, and reconsider, and reevaluate
all of the pieces.
He's trying to share it all with you,
fully, openly, honestly.
All Right. I'm On Board.
I Don't Know If There's Something Rotten In Denmark,
But It Sure SMELLS Like There's Something Rotten In sacramento,
in alaska, in california, on the west coast.
Let's Hear About It All.
You Said sacramento mayor
anne rudin Came To The Room Where Our Graduate Student Was Subbing.
And Mockingly Warned Him ?
Well, he didn't take it as a WARNING at that time.
He just thought she was being unprofessional, silly, childish.
He just thought these liberals
and feminists were incredibly shallow and childish
and kept proving it over and over.
Besides, he was just subbing.
He was being a wonderful citizen.
He was a (da da da da da dah !)
TEACHER !
But, in retrospect, after the felony fugitive charges,
after the jail time,
after the attempt at framing for bankruptcy fraud,
after attempts to entrap him into committing fraud,
he's re-evaluating everything
without the naivete and trusting innocence,
and he does think
sacramento mayor anne rudin's comment was a threat.
All Right.
Tomorrow, Let's Get Into The Subbing.
I Want To Hear About That Incident.
Tomorrow, then.
That, and much more.
OK
Very Easily.
OK
Very Easily.
sac city, sac state, uop, subbing, Victory '88
*****************************************************************************
OK
Very Easily.